Ten major sponsor package hand when zhou kai investment 'only signature doesn't work'

In September, IPO resumption of the first list of sponsors China merchants securities [ 18. 97 - 0. 32% shares! ] Chu-kai penalty. In July 2009, IPO resumption of the first ChanGuiLin sanjin [ 23. 72 - 1. 08% shares! ] ( 002275). On the shenzhen stock exchange small and medium-sized plate. A year later, however, was involved in the project sponsor, before when zhou kai of China merchants securities, has received the CSRC a paper ticket, because its during a sponsor representative, not sufficiently diligent and responsible, and sentenced to 12 months, the recommended heavy fines is not acceptable. In the sponsor guilin sanjin more than two years of time, chu-kai unexpectedly from does not have the investigation company to easily in the declaration signed commitment in the draft.



sponsor representative, as the employer's investment bank, China merchants securities? Since last year, IPO restart, China merchants securities has a total sponsor the 34 companies starting IPO, which passed there are 28, there are six veto by the CSRC. Tongji with Czech so many problems, we now video has the same problem, the space creatures is accused of & other; Big & throughout; , before joyboa technology will be reporting fraud. These companies start to apply for a veto by the securities and futures commission is not a surprise, surprise, China merchants securities why will frequently listed companies such as sponsor? On relevant issues, our reporter arrived early to the interview outline, China merchants securities fax over more than two days of time, however, as of press time, the company no reply.



the personage inside course of study thinks, chu-kai punishment afterwards, relative to the vested interests of sponsors, it seems to be too little. Bad luck is checked, the best is disqualified, expulsion, what's more, directly run, wealth is no affected.



chu-kai & ndash; — “ Signature not only work & throughout;



in many sponsors, China merchants securities before the sponsor representative Zhou Kaike is most & other; Lazy & throughout; A. In the sponsor guilin sanjin more than two years of time, chu-kai unexpectedly from does not have the investigation company to easily in the declaration signed commitment in the draft.



because the sponsor guilin sanjin obviously the work of dereliction of duty, chu-kai heavy penalties by regulators. When zhou kai in August this year, China merchants securities sponsor representative for as guilin sanjin pharmaceutical during the start of the project sponsor representative not sufficiently diligent and responsible, and is under no obligation to sponsor work, was sentenced to 12 months, the recommended heavy fines is not acceptable.



it is known that Zhou Kaizao in June 2007 as guilin sanjin after project sponsor representative, only to the project's prospectus, filing and other materials for review in writing, did not go to the site of the project for the supervision and inspection, failed to fulfil the responsibility of the sponsor representative. To alert the for industry, unlike previous just talk to remind, the SEC is moving about, decision since August 23, 2010, 12 months do not accept its responsible for recommendations. The move is broken one year's income. According to the China merchants securities, said the man is now left the company.



the personage inside course of study tells a reporter, guilin sanjin listing process, chu-kai problem may not be just not fully diligently so simple. As the IPO after the restart & other; Throughout the first &; , guilin sanjin in the process of listing, encountered & other; Deep throat & throughout; To report, to report guilin sanjin prospectus is false disclosure, think its prospectus not only inflated the total wages of 1995 to 1997 years; But also conceals the restructuring the company at the end of 1997 and mid-level managers secret by public funds to buy shares of the facts. When zhou kai and as a sponsor representatives only for the project of the prospectus, filing and other materials for the written examination, did not go to the site of the project for the supervision and inspection.