A report us the authority of the butterfly effect

The butterfly effect is really bad. Far ocean the other shore of the campaign for safe cosmetics organization issued a baby bath product safety report, they detected the kinds of baby shampoo, skin care and cosmetics on the market, it was found that traces of two 4-dioxane which kind of product testing, product detect trace formaldehyde, products containing the two substances at the same time. Unexpectedly, the effect of the report in the United States is not too big, can get China's consumers, manufacturers, busy around the supermarket and the relevant management department. We're not so busy. First to understand, why U. S. campaign for safe cosmetics group released the report. Released the organization is the purpose of such a report, because the United States have no current of formaldehyde in cosmetics and two evaluation standard, 4-dioxane residual set the organization want the report to urge government to intensify supervision and arouse the attention of the consumers. Again the identity of the U. S. campaign for safe cosmetics group. This is a non authority (a private The author here without any disrespect to non-governmental organizations) , if you have not bad memory, they are years made a lipstick test, published an article 'poison kiss: lipstick lead problem' report, the purpose is to urge the American government set the standard of set limit to of lead in cosmetics residues. The report also caused quite a stir in China. Don't know whether I learned the lesson of last import lipstick 'storm', aqsiq this time no intervention in a hurry. But don't get involved, as if also not way, for supermarkets, consumers have to act. It is reported that Shanghai has a supermarket shelves Johnson's baby bath products, and another fifty percent netizens said no longer buy Johnson &johnson baby bath product. Interestingly, in the website of the campaign for safe cosmetics group, particularly cited 'China's a big supermarket shelves Johnson &johnson baby product that defend bath' and 'the Vietnamese drug administration announced plans to test related baby bath products', the move with the United States food drug administration without action. Look, they are quite appreciate our quick response. But the current situation, and the relevant departments ( Even including related manufacturing enterprises) Not carefully read the reports and the report of the campaign for safe cosmetics group (the original Can download it from its official website is convenient) , also have relations. Especially ironically, according to the Beijing news reported February 2nd: the agency staff, said only on segment reporting, which is hard to see how a product containing what toxic substances; The agency plans to communicate with the American side, tracing the original test report. There are two final is worth using for reference. One is to study the work level of non-governmental organizations. The baby bath product safety report, page, illustrated, very detailed and professional, and easy to understand, especially the last page lists the reference item, a lot of academic papers and professional than us. Secondly, the higher the level of consumer. Consumers without proper training, do not know a lot of cosmetics must try, even after allergy, also don't know out of service. Of course, consumers need to learn, but the media, hospitals and departments must also assume corresponding liability.