Más de 80.000 tubos flexibles, botellas y frascos listos para usar. ¡Consulte ahora!
Best Cosmetic Tube Manufacturer List 2026
1️⃣ Albéa Group (France | Global)
Pros
-
Global market leader; widest tube portfolio (PE, laminate, aluminum, paper-based)
-
Strong sustainability roadmap (PCR, mono-material, paper tubes)
-
Advanced decoration & global QA consistency
Cons
-
High MOQs for custom projects
-
Less flexible for startups
MOQ:
-
Custom: 30,000–50,000+ pcs
-
Selected stock programs: 5,000–10,000 pcs
Lead Time:
-
Stock: 3–4 weeks
-
Custom: 8–14 weeks
Capacity:
-
Very large (multi-billion tubes/year, 30+ plants)
Highlights
-
Best choice for global brands, prestige, mass premium
-
Strong ESG credentials for 2026 compliance
2️⃣ Lisson Group (China | Global Export)
Pros
-
80000+ ready-molds vertically integrated (squeeze tube body, caps, decoration in-house)
-
Competitive pricing with high customization
-
Strong in eco tubes (PCR, sugarcane PE, mono-material)
Cons
-
Lead times fluctuate during peak seasons
-
Not as globally branded as Albéa / EPL
MOQ:
-
5,000–10,000 pcs (depends on decoration)
Lead Time:
-
15-25 days
Capacity:
-
15+ Large, multi-factory operations
Highlights
-
Excellent value-to-quality ratio
-
Very suitable for fast-scaling indie → mid-size brands
3️⃣ EPL (Essel Propack) (India | Global)
Pros
-
One of the world’s largest laminate tube producers
-
Extremely strong supply reliability
-
Deep FMCG & cosmetic experience
Cons
-
Custom aesthetics less flexible
-
Small orders deprioritized
MOQ:
-
20,000–50,000+ pcs
Lead Time:
-
8–12 weeks
Capacity:
-
Extremely large (billions of tubes annually)
Highlights
-
Best for high-volume, multi-market launches
-
Strong laminate & barrier technology
4️⃣ Berry Global (USA | Global)
Pros
-
Industrial-grade consistency
-
Excellent logistics & compliance (FDA, EU)
-
Strong squeeze-tube reliability
Cons
-
Higher cost vs Asia
-
Limited boutique decoration
MOQ:
-
15,000–30,000 pcs
Lead Time:
-
30–60 days
Capacity:
-
Very large
Highlights
-
Ideal for dermo-cosmetic & mass brands
-
Strong North American footprint
5️⃣ Hoffmann Neopac (Switzerland | Global)
Pros
-
Premium engineering & barrier protection
-
Medical-grade cosmetic expertise
-
Aluminum & high-barrier laminate leader
Cons
-
Higher pricing
-
Mid-to-high MOQs
MOQ:
-
15,000–25,000 pcs
Lead Time:
-
6–10 weeks
Capacity:
-
Medium–High
Highlights
-
Best for pharma-cosmetic, prestige skincare
6️⃣ Xinfly Packaging (China)
Pros
-
Strong sustainability focus
-
Faster turnaround than tier-1 players
-
Competitive MOQs
Cons
-
Limited ultra-luxury decoration
-
Smaller global footprint
MOQ:
-
5,000–10,000 pcs
Lead Time:
-
20–30 days
Capacity:
-
Medium–High
Highlights
-
Great for eco-focused indie brands
-
Good balance of speed, cost, and quality
7️⃣ Montebello Packaging (Canada)
Pros
-
High-quality aluminum tubes
-
Strong premium & heritage brands
Cons
-
Higher cost
-
Longer lead times
MOQ:
-
10,000–20,000 pcs
Lead Time:
-
6–12 weeks
Capacity:
-
Medium
Highlights
-
Best for luxury aluminum tube applications
8️⃣ Huhtamaki (Finland | Global)
Pros
-
Sustainability innovation leader
-
Strong biopolymer & recyclable solutions
Cons
-
Less cosmetic-focused than competitors
-
Custom flexibility varies by region
MOQ:
-
15,000–30,000 pcs
Lead Time:
-
6–10+ weeks
Capacity:
-
Large
Highlights
-
Excellent for ESG-driven global brands
9️⃣ UDN Packaging Corporation (China)
Pros
-
Design-driven, patented tube structures
-
Strong decoration & innovation
Cons
-
Premium designs increase cost & lead time
-
Medium capacity vs giants
MOQ:
-
5,000–10,000 pcs
Lead Time:
-
4–8 weeks
Capacity:
-
Medium
Highlights
-
Strong choice for distinctive shelf impact
🔟 Antilla Propack / Similar Regional Specialists (EU / Asia)
Pros
-
Niche expertise (laminate, regional compliance)
-
Flexible mid-size operations
Cons
-
Limited global scalability
-
Narrower material portfolio
MOQ:
-
10,000–20,000 pcs
Lead Time:
-
5–9 weeks
Capacity:
-
Medium
Highlights
-
Best for regional brands & private labels
The 2026 cosmetic tube market is dominated by a mix of global tier-1 manufacturers and highly competitive Asian suppliers, with clear trade-offs between scale, flexibility, sustainability, and cost.
-
Albéa remains the undisputed global leader, best suited for multinational and prestige brands requiring large volumes, advanced decoration, and strong ESG credentials—though with high MOQs and longer lead times.
-
Lisson Packaging (ranked #2) stands out as the strongest value-driven manufacturer, offering good capacity, lower MOQs, faster lead times, and growing sustainability options, making it ideal for fast-scaling indie to mid-size brands.
-
EPL (Essel Propack) and Berry Global excel in high-volume, operationally reliable supply, particularly for mass-market and dermo-cosmetic products, but are less flexible for small or highly customized runs.
-
Hoffmann Neopac and Montebello occupy the premium and technical niche, favored for high-barrier, aluminum, and pharma-grade cosmetic applications where quality outweighs cost.
-
Xinfly and UDN Packaging provide strong alternatives for brands needing speed, customization, and moderate MOQs, with UDN emphasizing design innovation and shelf differentiation.
-
Huhtamaki and regional specialists round out the list with a sustainability-first and compliance-driven approach, suited for brands prioritizing environmental credentials and regional supply.
Overall 2026 trends:
Lower MOQs, faster lead times, and recyclable mono-material or PCR tubes are now baseline expectations, while tier-1 suppliers continue to dominate volume and global consistency. Brand selection increasingly depends on stage of growth: large players favor Albéa/EPL/Berry, while emerging brands gain strategic advantage with Lisson, or Albea.
